The
Old Charges

The mediaeval constitutions of the British stone masons centralised

A bit of history…

The interest in studying the Old Charges appears to have followed the discovery of the Regius MS by J. O. Halliwell (1820-89) in the Royal Library of the British Museum in 1839. G. F. B. Kloss (1787-1854) was likely the first to subject the Old Charges to a true critical analysis in 1847, although few texts had been discovered at that time. However, it was only from 1864 onwards that the quest for old manuscripts of the craft truly began, thanks to W. J. Hughan (1841-1911) and A. F. A. Woodford (1821-87).

In 1872, W. J. Hughan identified thirty-two Old Charges. The German historian and philologist W. Begemann (1843-1914) classified the texts in families and branches in 1888. By 1889, R. F. Gould (1836-1915) listed sixty-two manuscripts, and in 1895, eighty-six. As the discoveries of these documents continued, ninety-eight texts were counted in 1918, including missing versions, which were known through other writings such as lodge registers or inventories. In 1951, H. Poole listed one hundred and four, to which twelve missing versions had to be added.

According to the study made in 2006 by the Canadian academic W. McLeod (1931-2020), there were one hundred and thirteen Old Charges identified, along with fourteen others that were missing or not yet found, and some of which are not known for certain to be genuine Old Charges.

Created by potrace 1.10, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2011

In 2020, the French Freemason D. Taillades challenged the classification and the datation of the manuscripts. He underlined that his predecessor omitted to include the George Grey MS, despite an article being published about it in 1999, and also the Dundee No. 2 MS, a copy of which the Canadian academic obtained in 1985 and transcribed, but which has not been published yet. Seven texts – that are fragments or references made by authors to Old Charges – were to be removed. Last, Taillades discovered the London Mason’s Company MS in 2023. There are therefore one hundred and eight Old Charges currently available. The French scholar also underlined that all the current dates were to be revisited and exposed a new approach of dating the manuscripts.

Old Charges

D. Knoop (1883-1948) and G. P. Jones (1892-1975) listed and commented the Masonic manuscripts, in 1942, but no effort has ever been made to centralize, digitize, and transcribe them reliably. Therefore, we have wished to create such a collection to make the work of researchers easier than ever.

For the first time, researchers can access all the information regarding the British Old Charges!

They worked on the classification and the datation of the Old Charges

Wilhelm Begemann

Main publications:

Vorgeschichte und Anfänge der Freimaurerei in England. Die alten englischen Werklogen und ihre Sprößlinge, E. S. Mittler und Sohn, Berlin, 1909. See partial translation in Trevor Stewart, The Stewart Papers: Begemann displayed, NFV GmbH, Hamburg, 2017.

“An attempt to classify the Old Charges of the British Freemasons”, AQC, vol. 1, 1888.
“Remarks on the ‘William Watson’ MS”, AQC, vol. 4, 1891.
“Remarks on The Craft Legend of the Old English Masons”, AQC, vol. 5, 1892.
“Dr Robert Plot. Part II”, AQC, vol. 6, 1893.
“The Assembly”, AQC, vol. 6, 1893.
“Remarks on the ‘Sloane Family’ of the Old Charges of the Freemasons”, AQC, vol. 14, 1901.

William James Hughan

Main publications:

The Old Charges of British Freemasons, London, 1872.
Origin of the English Rite of Freemasonry, London, 2nd édition, 1884.
The Thomas W. Tew MS, McCoquordale & Co Limited, London, 1892.
Antient Masonic Rolls of Constitutions of York Lodge no 236, Peck & Son, Hull, 1894.
The Old Charges of British Freemasons, London, 2nd edition, 1895.

“The John T. Thorp MS”, AQC, vol. 11, 1898.
“The York Grand Lodge”, AQC, vol. 13, 1900.
“The Levander-York MS”, AQC, vol. 18, 1905.
“The Taylor MS”, AQC, vol. 21, 1908.
“The ‘Tho. Carmick MS.’ And the introduction of Freemasonry into Philadelphia, USA”, AQC, vol. 22, 1909.

Herbert Poole

Main publications:

The Old Charges, The Masonic Record Ltd, London, 1924, Kessinger Reprint 2010.
The Old Charges, with Facsimile of the Dring-Gale MS, The Masonic Record Ltd, London, 1930.
Two Versions of the Old Charges with an Introducy Note on the Spencer Family, QC Pamphlet No 2, London, 1933.
The « Yorkshire » Old Charges of Masons, Johnson & Co Ltd., York, 1935. (with F. R. Worts).

“The Drinkwater MSS”, Transaction of the Manchester Association for Masonic Research, Manchester, vol. 15, 1924-1925.
“The Thristle MS”, AQC, vol. 35, 1922.
“The Graham Manuscript”, AQC, vol. 50, 1937.
“The Essex MS., Fresh evidence on the Graham MS.”, AQC, vol. 51, 1938.
“Huddlestone MS”, AQC, vol. 52, 1939.

Wallace McLeod

Main publications:

“The Old Charges and the Hathaway Manuscript: An Exercise of Methodology”, AQC, vol. 90, 1977.
“Additions to the list of Old Charges”, AQC, vol. 96, 1983.
“The Harris Manuscript No 2”, AQC, vol. 106, 1993.
“The Old Charges”, Heredom, vol. 14, 2006.

David Taillades

Main publications:

Les origines de la franc-maçonnerie à la lumière des sources documentaires, Ubik, 2023.
Aperçu sur les origines médiévales de la Franc-maçonnerie, Académie Maçonnique de Provence – Ubik, 2023.
Franc-maçonnerie, l’histoire retrouvée, Dervy, 2019.

“A New Approach to the Old Charges (Part II): Beyond the tables”, AQC, vol. 136, 2023.
“A New Approach to the Old Charges”, AQC, vol. 133, 2020.

Last uploaded papers

A new approach to the Old Charges – Part II

David Taillades’s article advances a comprehensive re-dating and re-ordering of the Old Charges by shifting analysis from the material witness to the textual content. The article...

A new approach to the Old Charges – Continuum Theory

David Taillades’s article reopens the question of how to date and interpret the Old Charges by shifting attention from the material witness to the textual content. The study...

The Old Charges

Prescott's essay deals with the Old Charges, a body of medieval and early modern manuscripts central to the understanding of operative and speculative Masonry. As in his earlier...

The Old Charges Revisited

Prescott's article engages with the Old Charges in light of broader debates about textual transmission, historical method, and the interpretive practices of previous generations...

The Old Charges

Wallace McLeod’s article in *Heredom* (2006) addresses the Old Charges with a strong historiographical ambition, aiming both to review their place in Masonic tradition and to...

The Harris manuscript No 2

Wallace McLeod’s article re-examines a British Library volume of The Freemasons’ Calendar (1781) into which three groups of manuscript notes were bound: (1) lodge procedures...

Observations on MS Grand Lodge No 1

The article, forming with two earlier instalments, a sustained inquiry into the early Old Charges, re-examines the manuscript commonly styled Grand Lodge No. 1. The author...

St Alban who lovyd welle masons

Aston's article examines the references to St. Alban and St. Amphibalus in the Cooke Manuscript within the wider literary and historiographical tradition of medieval England....

The York MS No 1

Geoffrey Markham’s paper addresses the provenance, dating, and contextual significance of one of the Old Charges manuscripts linked to the York Grand Lodge. The author situates...

The missing constitutions, contenders and pretenders

Robert Turner’s article addresses the question of lost or untraced manuscripts of the Old Charges. His focus lies not on presenting new texts but on reconstructing, through...